U.S. court says Algerian man at Guantanamo should get new hearing

WASHINGTON—A U.S. appeals court says an Algerian protesting his Guantanamo detention deserves a new lower court review — to determine whether he was part of Al Qaeda, not just a supporter.

A three-judge panel of the District of Columbia Circuit reversed a lower court decision that Belkacem Bensayah’s imprisonment was legal.

“The evidence upon which the district court relied, in concluding Bensayah supported Al Qaeda is insufficient … to show he was part of that organization,” U.S. Circuit Judge Douglas Ginsburg wrote.

He said the lower court needs to determine whether Bensayah “was functionally part of Al Qaeda.”

A U.S. district judge found that the government sufficiently presented classified evidence from an unnamed source that Bensayah was a substantial Al Qaeda supporter.

Ginsburg questioned that evidence. And he further said the lower court “did not go on to consider whether he was a ‘member’ of Al Qaeda or whether his detention was lawful on the alternative ground that he was ‘part of’ that organization.”

The case was decided June 28 and released Friday with several classified portions blacked out.

Dozens of terror suspects have argued for their freedom from imprisonment at the U.S. naval base in Cuba where terrorism suspects are held. The Supreme Court has ruled the prisoners have a right to their day in court.

Bensayah was arrested by Bosnian police on immigration charges in late 2001. He was later told that he and five other Algerian men were suspected of plotting to attack the United States Embassy in Sarajevo.

When a Bosnian investigation failed to uncover sufficient evidence of the plot, the men were turned over to the United States and transported to Guantanamo in January 2002.

Ginsburg pointed out that the Obama administration changed the government’s position on Bensayah, originally arguing he could be detained as a “supporter” of Al Qaeda and later arguing he was part of the terrorist organization.

“The government now contends that Bensayah’s detention is lawful only because he was ‘part of’ Al Qaeda,” Ginsburg wrote.

“The government presented no direct evidence of actual communication between Bensayah and any Al Qaeda member, much less evidence suggesting Bensayah communicated with (name deleted) or anyone else in order to facilitate travel by an Al Qaeda member.”

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply