Dutch move on slaughter of livestock Reviewed by Sandrea on Jun 29Rating:
THE Dutch parliament has passed a bill banning the slaughter of livestock without stunning it first, removing an exemption that has allowed Jews and Muslims to butcher animals according to their centuries-old dietary rules.
If enacted and enforced, religious groups say observant Jews and Muslims would have to import meat from abroad, stop eating it altogether, or leave the Netherlands.
However, the bill must still pass the Senate, which is unlikely before the summer recess, and the Cabinet said the law may be unenforceable in its current form due in part to ambiguity introduced in a last-minute amendment.
The move comes after Australia banned the export of live cattle to Indonesia over animal cruelty allegations.
It also follows revelations that livestock in Australia were routinely killed without first being stunned, despite the Gillard government’s encouragement of Indonesia to adopt the practice nationally.
If the Netherlands outlaws procedures that make meat kosher for Jews or halal for Muslims, it will be the second country after New Zealand to do so in recent years. It will join Switzerland, the Scandinavian and Baltic countries, whose bans are mostly traceable to pre-World War II anti-Semitism.
“The Cabinet will give its judgment over the proposed law after it has been treated by both houses,” said Deputy Secretary of Economic Affairs and Agriculture Henk Blekers.
The Cabinet will “also look at how it fits with freedom of religion,” he said, citing the European Convention on Human Rights.
MP Marianne Thieme of the Party for the Animals, the world’s first animal rights party to win seats in a national parliament, welcomed the approval of the bill that she had first introduced in 2008, and said she was now prepared to defend it in the Senate.
“It’s a great honour,” she said. She has argued that sparing animals needless pain and distress outweighs religious groups’ rights to follow slaughter practices “no longer of our time.”
But the threat of a possible ban has led to outcry from Jewish and Muslim groups who say it infringes on their right to freedom of religion.
Around one million Muslims live in the Netherlands, mostly immigrants from Turkey and Morocco. The once-strong Jewish community now numbers 40,000-50,000 after more that 70 per cent were deported and killed by the Nazis during World War II.
“The Dutch Jewish community is small and the Jewish kosher meat consumption is smaller still, but the impact on our community is deep and large,” said a committee of rabbis pleading with parliament not to pass the law in an open letter Tuesday.
“Older Jews are frightened and wonder what the next law will be that limits their religious life. The youth are openly asking whether they still have a future that they can or want to build in the Netherlands.”
A solid majority of Dutch voters say they support the ban, and parliament voted for it by a margin of 116 for to 30 against.
Ritual slaughter rules prescribe that animals’ throats must be cut swiftly with a razor-sharp knife while they are still conscious, so that they bleed to death quickly.
Support for the ban came from the political left, which sees ritual slaughter as inhumane, and from the anti-immigration right, which sees it as foreign and barbaric.
Only Christian parties were opposed, arguing the ban undermines the country’s long tradition of religious tolerance.
Centrist parties were initially divided, with many of them loath to lose support of Muslim voters. Last week they introduced an amendment that says ritual slaughterers may still be granted licences, if they can “prove” that it does not cause animals more pain than stunning.
Animal slaughter methods have been in the spotlight in Australia, where the government recently banned the live cattle trade to Indonesia earlier following concerns about animal rights abuses, including animals being killed without first being stunned.